Search Content

WhitePapers


Which CMS Is Right For Me?

If you're wondering which CMS is the right one for your organization, this comprehensive guide will take you through the various options available, detailing the pros and cons of each. Download...Read More


How to Buy a Phone System

Considering a new phone system for your business? The Phone System Buyer's Guide from VoIP-News provides you with all of the information you need to make a more informed decision. The Guide helps you...Read More


Oracle Magazine

Oracle Magazine contains technology strategy articles, sample code, tips, Oracle and partner news, how to articles for developers and DBAs, and more. Oracle (NASDAQ: ORCL) is the world's largest...Read More


Sales Force Automation Comparison Guide

Businesses of all sizes can benefit by automating all aspects of their sales processes with an SFA (Sales Force Automation) solution. But due to the sheer number of features that most SFA solutions...Read More




View All Whitepapers

On CRM and User Acceptance Testing...

Having sat through countless sales presentations over the years where vendors have rhapsodized about their carefully honed implementation methodology I can observe that the reality rarely measures up to promise of the pitch.

One manifestation is the quality of what gets delivered into the user acceptance testing (UAT) phase where the client assesses whether the development work undertaken by the vendor meets their requirements. Its at this point that the vendor can, to use a sporting metaphor, throw their client a hospital pass.
In principle, and according to the fluently presented glossy implementation methodology, what the vendor should provide to the client is a rigorously tested system, which can practically be waved through UAT.
In practice however, the rigorous testing phase can quickly be dispensed with if the vendor finds them self under time or budget pressure, and the client effectively gets landed with the vendors testing responsibilities, or worse, gets to try and test something thats effectively still in development the equivalent of putting up the wallpaper while the plasterer is still at work. What might have been a relatively trivial piece of work is transformed into a death march as the bug count ratchets up and up.
Just to make this all slightly more pressurized, because UAT is pretty much the final step before live, most of the associated live activities are all now scheduled, and theres relatively little scope to move dates out to reflect the unexpected influx of work, and so the test team ends up absorbing the workload the best way they can generally dispensing with lifes luxuries such as sleep.
There are however a few things that can be done to help address this:
Have a detailed mutually agreed and understood design specification that gives you something to test against this limits the scope for misunderstanding as to what should be delivered
Give yourself plenty of wiggle room in the project plan in order to absorb the unexpected developments that will inevitably occur.
Pay for implementation work on the basis of achieving defined milestones, and make sure one of those milestones is the delivery of a high quality system into UAT. Im also wondering, though Ive yet to try it, whether its worth offering vendors bonuses for hitting quality targets, just because of the potential downstream savings.
Make sure your vendor has scheduled for resources to be available to quickly fix the issues you identify, because if developers get allocated to other projects, you could be facing a long wait.
Assume the worst, because youll generally be proved right, and allow more time than you possibly think youll need.
In summary, while UAT is one of the final hurdles in the implementation process, its been responsible for more than its fair share of project delays, and has tempted many a project into the potentially fatal act of going live with a part-cooked system. As with many aspects of CRM implementation, its worth treating cautiously.

Related Salesforce Mobile Articles

ConceptDraw MindMap


ConceptDraw MindMap is a mind mapping and brainstorming software that you may use for capturing ideas, planning events as well taking notes in a more visual interface. It is one of the very popular mind mapping software and often rated at par with...

Read more about ConceptDraw MindMap...

Aurora: Making The Movie


When we set out to make Aurora we thought, This cant be that hard. Weve made concept videos before. But the complexity and ambiguous nature of the production process caught us by surprise, challenging us far beyond our expectations. From a...

Read more about Aurora: Making The Movie...